This idea/suggestion is Open. You can respond to ask questions or discuss the idea and either vote it up or down if you believe it should or should not be implemented, respectively. Popular suggestions and ideas will be considered by the development team to become reality in-game.
This prefix is applied by a Galactic Senator when they are officially sponsoring a post for consideration by the Development Team.
- Proposal
Reduce the V.I.P. Bunker lot requirement from 2 lots to 1 lot.
No other changes are requested to storage, interior layout, or acquisition method.
- Justification
The V.I.P. Bunker is significantly smaller and more limited than most 2-lot structures. Adjusting it to 1 lot would better reflect its actual size and functionality, improve lot efficiency for players, and increase usage of an otherwise underutilized Fortitude reward. This change would have no impact on balance, progression, or the economy.
- Motivation
As city planning and efficient lot usage become more important to players, the V.I.P. Bunker’s 2-lot cost stands out as disproportionate. This has led many players to avoid using the structure despite its theme and availability. A lot-cost adjustment would make it a more attractive and practical housing option.
The V.I.P. Bunker is a unique and visually appealing structure, but its current 2-lot requirement discourages use due to its small footprint and limited interior space. This suggestion proposes a simple lot-cost adjustment to better align it with comparable structures and encourage wider adoption.
Makes sense. The smaller version of the musty bunker is a fancy closet sized building. Should not get penalized by 2 lots imo also.
Makes sense. The smaller version of the musty bunker is a fancy closet sized building. Should not get penalized by 2 lots imo also.
Appreciate the support Nex. Hopefully a Senator will pick this up for sponsorship.
Upvoted! I agree with the reasons listed.
makes perfect sense to be 1 lot for only 1 room
Great proposal, I think with this in mind it would be great to look at the Commando Bunker lots as well! Thank you for posting this. I have senate sponsored due to community interest!
Upvoted as well. I think these pv's are generally looked upon favorably for changes. Thanks for the senator support.
Great proposal, I think with this in mind it would be great to look at the Commando Bunker lots as well! Thank you for posting this. I have senate sponsored due to community interest!
Thanks for the senate sponsorship Kung, appreciate it!
Most welcome, thank you for making the post!
I've also been informed the musty lot/storage is also negatively skewed, popping a note for that here. It's interesting that the bunkers seem to suffer, as such a sought after item for players!
