Open - Artisan - Social - Make Space Collections (that provide schematics) Repeatable | Star Wars Galaxies Restoration

Open Artisan Social Make Space Collections (that provide schematics) Repeatable

This idea/suggestion is Open. You can respond to ask questions or discuss the idea and either vote it up or down if you believe it should or should not be implemented, respectively. Popular suggestions and ideas will be considered by the development team to become reality in-game.

PhilmorALF

Galactic Senator
Joined
Jul 16, 2021
Messages
199
Reaction score
231
Proposal
I propose that collection schematics from space junk collections become repeatable to allow for the recrafting of these components. To be clear - this does not include schematics that are granted as the result of a slayer collection (gunships), and only includes the 'Space Collections' Items where 10 'Junk'
components must be collected to be granted a schematic.
Justification
This helps pilots by getting the option of upgrading their collection schematic pieces on a more routine basis if a superior resource spawns. It provides an additional resource sink as components will be crafted more often. It also adds some sort of value to the collection pieces as more crafters will want them to craft/stock vendors so there is an actual use instead of being deleted/sitting in a bag.

Just wanted to start a conversation on a more direct idea instead of bucketed in a larger PV. This idea was brought to you from the Decay Player voice courtesy of the former Space Senator - Narmy.
Motivation
Some of these schematics are used heavily by the space community, but as resources mature, players are stuck with a component based on the quality of resources that were available when they initially got these components crafted. This requires them to search for newer players that can complete the collection and provide a schematic in order for them to get a component crafted with updated resources, which eventually starts the cycle over for the next person.
.
 
Joined
May 29, 2021
Messages
41
Reaction score
51
Thanks Phil, I'll just add these to the list I'm working on atm
 
Joined
Feb 2, 2022
Messages
32
Reaction score
31
Age
53
Location
Phoenix
I was talking with a few about this. And I come down on both sides of the argument.
With the new overhauls, some of those parts will be absolutely spectacular now...
But they were supposed to be rare.... I still like the idea and am only mad I could not make a voice for it before you did.
 
Joined
Sep 22, 2021
Messages
125
Reaction score
53
Ive already addressed this in the space decay PV.

Narmy the REAL Space Senator
 
Joined
Sep 22, 2021
Messages
125
Reaction score
53
I was talking with a few about this. And I come down on both sides of the argument.
With the new overhauls, some of those parts will be absolutely spectacular now...
But they were supposed to be rare.... I still like the idea and am only mad I could not make a voice for it before you did.
Plkease do not try and rip off someone elses ideas because you dont know about things
 

PhilmorALF

Galactic Senator
Joined
Jul 16, 2021
Messages
199
Reaction score
231
Ive already addressed this in the space decay PV.

Narmy the REAL Space Senator
If you read the last sentence - you would have realized I already mentioned that. It's easier to get decision on a more direct PV, instead of listing 10 things at once, which is why I pulled this one out.
 
Joined
Sep 22, 2021
Messages
125
Reaction score
53
I was talking with a few about this. And I come down on both sides of the argument.
With the new overhauls, some of those parts will be absolutely spectacular now...
But they were supposed to be rare.... I still like the idea and am only mad I could not make a voice for it before you did.
This shows how little you know about space and why you are an unfit and unworthy senator.

The engine subcomps that I was pushing for and which where recently added are for as the name suggests ENGINES. Not reactors caps or boosters.

If you read the last sentence - you would have realized I already mentioned that. It's easier to get decision on a more direct PV, instead of listing 10 things at once, which is why I pulled this one out.
You did not mention which PV it was from nor credit the person whos idea it was.
 

PhilmorALF

Galactic Senator
Joined
Jul 16, 2021
Messages
199
Reaction score
231
This shows how little you know about space and why you are an unfit and unworthy senator.

The engine subcomps that I was pushing for and which where recently added are for as the name suggests ENGINES. Not reactors caps or boosters.


You did not mention which PV it was from nor credit the person whos idea it was.
Done. Your complaining can end now.
 
Joined
Sep 22, 2021
Messages
125
Reaction score
53
How about you change it from former space senator to real space senator then it will be fine :)